In public relations, advertising and marketing, we’re especially susceptible to latching onto of-the-moment words and using them and using them and using them until they’re used to death (their meaning and power dies).
Our company is the industry-leader in innovative utilisation of words, strategically leveraging their unique value proposition to uphold its position as the world-class communications solutions provider with unmatched, seamlessly integrated and robust best practice.
A useful test for the sloppy use of a word is to inquire whether it is being used to draw a meaningful distinction? Consider the term "robust". Are there any products that seek to be non-robust? There aren't, so it is not drawing a useful distinction. Then consider the term "organic growth". Are there products intentionally designed under a different philosophy? Indeed there are: some products are released in a crude form and polished publicly, but others are developed privately and revealed when considered perfect.


